download PDF

Abstract

The article deals with the Battle of Mesiche in the context of the events of the Persian campaign of Gordian III. Arguments are given in favor of the fact that the Battle of Mesiche should be considered the general battle of the armies of the two empires and the decisive event of the campaign. These sources allow us to confi dently speak of a major defeat for the Romans, however, the Roman army was clearly not completely defeated. There is reason to believe that one of the reasons for the victory of the Persians was the severe wounding of Gordian during the battle. Having not achieved victory, the Roman army found itself in a diffi cult situation, as it lacked food. An important factor that aggravated the situation for the Romans was that a large canal blocked the way for their retreat. Therefore, despite the fact that the Roman army was not ultimately defeated at Mesiche, the consequences of this defeat were very signifi cant. The new emperor Philip was forced to conclude a peace treaty with the Persians on the terms of the payment of indemnity to the winners and the renunciation of Rome from spheres of infl uence in Armenia, as well as in Northern Mesopotamia. Thus, the defeat at Mesiche predetermined the unsuccessful outcome of Gordian’s Persian campaign and led to the conclusion of an unfavorable treaty for Rome, the terms of which changed the balance of power in the Middle East in favor of the Persians. The article also discusses various versions of the death of Gordian III. A version of the death of the emperor is proposed, which is consistent with the majority of confl icting evidence from sources. A reconstruction of events is proposed, which includes the wound of the emperor received during the battle, the rebellion of the soldiers and the subsequent death of Gordian.

Keywords

Roman Empire, Sasanians, Gordian III, Shapur I, Philip the Arab, battle of Mesiche, Roman-Persian wars.

Evgeniy B. Mirzoev

Moscow City Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russia

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abramzon, M.G. 2005: Osroena v rimskoy vostochnoy politike v I v. do n.e. – III v. n.e. [Osroenе in the Roman eastern policy in 1st c. BC – 3rd c. AD] Problemy istorii, fi lologii, kul’tury. [Journal of Historical, Philological and Cultural Studies] XV, 111–119.

Абрамзон, М.Г. 2005: Осроена в римской восточной политике в I в. до н. э. – III в. н.э. ПИФК XV, 111–119.

Ando, C. 2012: Imperial Rome AD 193 to 284. The Critical Century. Edinburgh.

Canepa, M.P. 2009: The Two Eyes of the Earth. Art and Ritual of Kingship between Rome and Sasanian Iran. Los Angeles–London.

Claes, L., Tavernier, J. 2018: Exit Gordianus, but how? Shapur’s trilingual inscription revisited. Syria: revue d’art oriental et d’archeologie 95, 357–374.

De Blois, L. 1978–1979: The Reign of the Emperor Philip the Arabian. Talanta 10.11, 11–43.

Dietz, K. 2000: Legio III Italica. In: Y.Le Bohec (ed.), Les legions de Rome sous le Haut-Empire. Lyon, 133–143.

Dmitriyev, V.A. 2008: “Vsadniki v sverkayushchey brone”: Voennoe delo sasanidskogo Irana i istoriya rimsko-persidskih voyn [“Horsmen in shining armour”: Warfare of Sasanian Iran and History of Roman-Persian Wars]. Saint Petersburg.

Дмитриев, В.А. 2008: «Всадники в сверкающей броне»: Военное дело сасанидского Ирана и история римско-персидских войн. СПб.

Dodgeon, M.H., Lieu Samuel, N.С. 1994: The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars AD 226–363. London–New York.

Edwell, P. 2008: Between Rome and Persia. The Middle Euphrates, Mesopotamia and Palmyra under Roman Control. London–New York.

Edwell, P. 2021: Rome and Persia at War. Imperial Competition and Contact, 193–363 CE. London–New York.

Enßlin, W. 1949: Zu den Kriegen des Sassaniden Schapur I. München.

Geyer, B., Monchambert, J.-Y. 2003: La Basse Vallée de L’Euphrate Syrien du Néolithique à l’avènement de l’islam. 2 vols. Beyrouth.

Gomez-Pantoja, J. 2000: Legio X Gemina. In: Y.Le Bohec (ed.), Les legions de Rome sous le Haut-Empire. Lyon, 169–190.

Guey, J. 1961: Autour des Res Gestae Divi Saporis I: Deniers (d’or) et (de compte) ancient. Syria 38, 261–283.

Herrmann, G. 2000: The Rock Reliefs of Iran. In: J. Curtis (ed.), Mesopotamia and Iran in the Parthian and Sasanian Periods: Rejection and Revival c. 238 BC – AD 642. London, 35–45.

Honigman, E., Maricq, A. 1953: Recherches sur les Res Gestae divi Saporis. Bruxelles.

Huyse, Ph. 1999: Die Dreisprachige Inschrift Šābuhrs I. an Der Ka’ba-I Zardušt (ŠKZ). In: Corpus Inscriptionum Iranicarum Vol. 3.1. London.

Kettenhofen, E. 1982: Die römisch-persischen Kriege des 3. Jahrhunderts n. Chr: nach der Inschrift Šāhpuhrs I. an der Kaʻbe-ye Zartošt (ŠKZ). Wiesbaden.

Livshits, V.A., Nikitin, A.B. 1992: Some Notes on the Inscription from Naṣrābād. Bulletin of the Asia Institute 5, 41–44.

Lörincz, B. Legio I Adiutrix. In: Y. Le Bohec (ed.), Les legions de Rome sous le Haut-Empire. Lyon, 151–158.

Loriot, X. 1975: Les premières années de la grande crise du IIIe siècle: De l’avènement de Maximin le Thrace (235) à la mort de Gordien III (244). Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II. 2, 657–787.

Lukonin, V.G. 1969: Kul’tura sasanidskogo Irana [Culture of Sasanian Iran]. Moscow.

Луконин, В.Г. 1969: Культура сасанидского Ирана. М.

MacDonald, D. 1981: The Death of Gordian III: Another Tradition. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 30/4, 502–508.

MacMullen, R. 1980: How Big was the Roman Army? Klio 62, 451–460.

Maricq, A. 1958: Classica et Orientalia: 5. Res Gestae Divi Saporis. Syria 35, 3.4, 295–360.

Mirzoev, E.B. 2016: Shapur I. Triumf nad Rimom [Shapur I. Triumph over Rome]. Saint Petersburg.

Мирзоев, Е.Б. 2016: Шапур I. Триумф над Римом. СПб.

Mosig-Walburg, K. 2009: Römer und Perser: vom 3. Jahrhundert bis zum Jahr 363 n. Chr. Gutenberg.

Nadirov, I.I. 2009: Hatra. Araby mezhdu Parfi ey i Rimom [Hatra. The Arabians between Parthia and Rome]. Saint Petersburg.

Надиров, И.И. 2009: Хатра. Арабы между Парфией и Римом. СПб.

Nikonorov, V.P. 2005: K voprosu o parfyanskom nasledii v sasanidskom Irane [On the Parthian Legacy in Sasanian Iran: the Case of Warfare]. In: V.P. Nikonorov (ed.), Central’naya Asiya ot Akhemenidov do Timuridov. Materialy` mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, posvyashhennoy 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Aleksandra Markovicha Belenitskogo [Central Asia from the Achaemenids to the Timurids: Archaeology, History, Ethnology, Culture. Proceedings of the international scientifi c conference dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the birth of Alexander Markovich Belenitsky]. Saint Petersburg, 141–179.

Никоноров, В.П. 2005: К вопросу о парфянском наследии в сасанидском Иране. В сб.: В.П. Никоноров (ред.), Центральная Азия от Ахеменидов до Тимуридов: археология, история, этнология, культура. Материалы международной научной конференции, посвященной 100-летию со дня рождения Александра Марковича Беленицкого. СПб, 141–179.

Potter, D.S. 1990: Prophecy and History in the Crisis of the Roman Empire. An Historical Commentary on the Thirteenth Sibylline Oracle. Oxford.

Potter, D.S. 2004: The Roman Empire at Bay. London–New York.

Rostovtzeff , M.I. 1943: Res Gestae Divi Saporis and Dura. Berytus 8:1, 17–60.

Sprengling, M. 1953: Third Century Iran. Sapor and Kartir. Chicago.

Stolte, B.H. 1970: De dood van Keizer Gordianus III en de onbetrouwbaarheid van de Res Gestae Divi Saporis. Lampas 2.4, 377–385.

Tavoosi, M., Frye, R.N. 1989: An Inscribed Capital Dating from the Time of Shapur I. Bulletin of the Asia Institute 3, 25–38.

Tsirkin,Y.B. 2015: “Voennaya anarkhiya” v Rimskoy imperii [“Military anarchy” in the Roman Empire]. Saint Petersburg.

Циркин, Ю.Б. 2015: «Военная анархия» в римской империи. СПб.