download PDF

Abstract

The criticisms of S.Yu. Saprykin on the reconstruction of two inscriptions from Phanagoria published by N.V. Zavoykina in 2018 are discussed in the article. The fi rst inscription is a dedication to Zeus Uranius and Soteros set by a certain son of Mastos, the son of Maeous, the governor of the royal residence according to a vow in AD 128 or 129. It is carved on the outside of the marble cult bowl, it is presumably a perriereterium. S.Yu. Saprykin believes that the marble fragments belong to a city nymphaeum and also offers a new reconstruction of 1–2 lines of the inscription. The author gives a number of counterarguments to Saprykin’s corrections. It is shown in the article that there is no reason to believe that the marble fragments belong to a city nymphaeum because a reconstructed size of the cult bowl is quite small for a city water basin. It could contain no more than 5 liters of water. Also, there is no reason to think that the inscription was put by a certain son whose name ends in -demos according to a vow to an unknown deity with the epiclesis of Soteros. As the result the author corrects the 2 line of the dedicated inscription and gives its new reading: v. Δηὶ v. Ο[ὐρανίωι | κ]αὶ Σωτῆρι ε[ὐξάμενος ἀνέθηκα ὁ δεῖνα] | [Μασ?]τοῦ Μαέους το[ῦ ἐπὶ τῆς βασ]ιλείας |4 [ἐν] τῶι Ε Κ Υ΄ ἔτ[ει καὶ μη]νὶ Γορπιαίου.

The second inscription is a graffi to of a private character mentioned of Nyse and dated to the Late Archaic time. It is incised of a sherd of a black-ware small vase bottom. According to the photograph of S.Yu. Saprykin proposes new additions to letters and sights in the inscription and believes that the graffi to may be the spell of Nysa not Nyse. The analysis of his corrections and the comparison of his reading with the graffi to de visu led the author to conclude that the reconstruction proposed by Saprykin in a number of places does not fi nd support in the graffi to: for new letters and a sign of interconnection Saprykin accepts all kinds of damage and erosion of the black-were surface of the ostracon.

Keywords

Cimmerian Bosporus, Phanagoria, inscriptions, graffi ti, the Late Archaic Time, the Roman time.

Natalia V. Zavoykina

Institute of Archaeology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Emets, I.A. 2012: Graffi ti i dipinti iz antichnykh gorodov i poseleniy Severnogo Prichernomor'ya (Graffiti and dipinti from ancient cities and settlements in the Black Sea). Moscow.

Rusyaeva, A.S. 2010: Graffi ti Ol'vii Pontiyskoy (Graffi ti of Olbia Pontica) (Materials in archaeology, history and ethnography of Tauria. Supplementum 8). Simferopol'.

Iozzo, M. 1987: Corinthian basins on high stands. Hesperia 56 (4), 355–416.

Ramsay, W.M. 1912: The Tekmorian Guest-friends. JHS 32, 151–170.

Saprykin, S.Yu. 2019a: K publikatsii bosporskikh nadpisiy [On the publication of Bosporan inscriptions]. Aristeas 20, 143–156

Saprykin, S.Yu. 2019b: K prochteniyu i interpretatsii nekotorykh bosporskikh graffi ti [The reading and interpretations of some Bosporan graffi ti], Drevnosti Bospora [Antiquities of Bosprus] 24. Moscow, 473–487.

Yaylenko, V.P. 1980: Graffiti Levki, Berezani, Ol’vii [Graffi ti from Leuka, Berezan’, Olbia]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 3, 75–116.

Zavoykina, N.V. 2018а: Novaya posvyatitel’naya nadpis’ iz Fanagorii [New dedicated inscription from Phanagoria]. In: V.D. Kuznetsov (ed.). Fanagoriya. Materialy po arkheologii I istorii [Phanagoreia. Materials on the archaeology and history] 4 (Fanagoria [Phanagoreia] 7). Moscow, 106–117.

Zavoykina, N.V. 2018b: Dva graffi ti chastnogo kharaktera pozdnearkhaicheskogo vremeni iz Fanagorii [Two private graffi ti of the Late Archaic time from Phanagoria], Drevnosti Bospora [Antiquities of Bosprus] 22. Moscow, 67–71.

Zgusta L. 1964: Kleinasiatische Personennamen. Prag.