download PDF

Abstract

The Amur locations of the petroglyphs of Sikachi-Alyan (the Khabarovsk Territory) stand out among the sites with rock art in Russia and the world for their “mobility”. Petroglyphs are found here on boulders located in the floodplain of the river Amur and are annually exposed to floods and ice drifts. It is quite obvious that in this case the boulders can move, and the petroglyphs can be destroyed. However, until recently, it was not possible to obtain quantitative characteristics of these movements, which led researchers to erroneous conclusions about the nature of the movement of boulders. Within the framework of a joint project of the Institute of Archaeology Russian Academy of Sciences and the Khabarovsk Regional Center for the Protection of Historical and Cultural Monuments to monitor the state of petroglyphs of the Lower Amur and Ussuri at the Sikachi-Alyan I and Sikachi-Alyan II sites in 2017–2021 aerial photography was carried out with a UAV, based on the results of which digital relief models were built for the areas of boulders with petroglyphs in the floodplain. Comparison of these models made it possible to objectively determine the numerical characteristics of the movements of boulders with petroglyphs and assess the degree of impact of floods and ice drifts on the preservation of the rock art site.

Keywords

Rock art, petroglyphs, monitoring, destruction factors, the Lower Amur.

Yuriy M. Svoyskiy, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia; Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; RSSDA Laboratory, Moscow, Russia

Elena S. Levanova, Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Ekaterina V. Romanenko, RSSDA Laboratory, Moscow, Russia

Devlet, E.G., Devlet, M.A., 2005: Mify v kamne. Mir naskal’nogo iskusstva Rossii [Myths in Stone. Russia’s World of Rock Art]. Moscow.

Devlet, E.G., Laskin, A.R. 2015a: Petroglify Khabarovskogo kraya: rezul’taty monitoringa posledstviy pavodka v 2013 godu na Amure i Ussuri [Petroglyphs of the Khabarovsk territory: the impact of the 2013 Amur and Ussuri fl ooding]. Arkheologiya, etnografiya i antropologiya Evrazii [Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia] 43 (4), 94–105.

Devlet, E.G., Laskin, A.R. 2015b: Sikachi-Alyan. In: Bol’shaya Rossiyskaya Entsiklopediya [The Great Russian Encyclopedia], https://old.bigenc.ru/archeology/text/3661374

Devlet, E.G., Laskin, A.R. 2017: Sostoyanie sokhrannosti petroglifov Sikachi-Alyana: prirodnoe i antropogennoe vozdeystvie [The Sikachi-Alyan petroglyphs’ conservation status: natural and anthropogenic impact]. In: S.V. Batarshev, A.M. Shipovalov (eds.), Arkheologiya CIRCUM–PACIFIC: Pamyati Igorya Yakovlevicha Shevkomuda [CIRCUM-PACIFIC Archaeology: In the Memory of Igor Yakovlevich Shevkomud]. Vladivostok, 252–265.

Devlet, E.G., Laskin, A.R., Pakhunov, A.S. 2018: Faktory razrusheniya i problemy sokhraneniya Nizhneamurskikh petroglifov [The Lower Amur petroglyphs: destructive factors and conservation issues]. Problemy istorii, fi lologii, kul’tury [Journal of historical, philological, and cultural studies] 2, 25–43.

Laskin, A.R. 2014: O rezul’tatakh obsledovaniya petroglifov Sikachi-Alyana i Sheremet’evo [On the results of the survey of petroglyphs of Sikachi-Alyan and Sheremetyevo in 2014]. Kratkiye soobshcheniya Instituta arkheologii [Brief Communications of the Institute of Archaeology] 236, 82–86.

Laufer B. 1899: Petroglyphs on the Amur. American Anthropologist, 749–750.

Okladnikov A.P., 1971: Petroglify Nizhnego Amura [Petroglyphs of Lower Amur]. Leningrad.

Sokolova, G.V. 2022: Statisticheskiy analiz vodnogo rezhima reki Amur dlya tseley prognoza [Statistical analysis of the Amur river water regime for the purposes of the forecast]. Regional’nye problemy [Regional Problems] 25 (1), 49–61.