download PDF

Abstract

After the revolution of 1917, the sphere of science and culture in the USSR suffered fundamental changes: universities, institutes, museums had to correlate their activities with specifi c objectives that came from government bodies, as well as with the ideological canon of “Marxism-Leninism” in understanding the world historical progress, which itself in the 1920s ‒ 1930s was still passing the stage of formation. The beginning of the 1930s in the history of the State Hermitage was marked by the beginning of the stage of “socialist reconstruction”, accordingly, previous scholarly discussions acquired a new ideological tone. In these discussions, the struggle for influence within the museum, a different understanding of the museum and exhibition activities, and ways to convey the necessary meaning of the exhibits to the visitors were intertwined. The main actors in the discussions regarding the understanding of ancient Oriental society in general and ancient Egypt in particular were V.V. Struve and I.M. Lurie. The authors publish four documents from 1931 from the Archive of the State Hermitage. These documents show that V.V. Struve acted more as a dogmatist, for whom the literal correspondence of the museum’s work program to the sociological categories developed by K. Marx was the most important point. I.M. Lurie and his colleagues in the struggle against Struve were ready to give up the purity of Marxist teachings and defended the possibility of relatively free use of the categorical apparatus. In museum practice, I.M. Lurie defended the primacy of exhibits, unlike V.V. Struve, who emphasized the paramount importance of labeling. Ultimately, having won the fight against the opponent, I.M. Lurie and his Hermitage colleagues throughout the 1930s used categorical apparatus quite outside his canonically Marxist version.

Keywords

Ancient World History, Ancient Orient, Ancient Egypt, slavery, feudalism, Asian mode of production, the State Hermitage, V.V. Struve, I.M. Lurie.

Vitaly G. Ananiev

Institute of Philosophy, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Mikhail D. Bukharin

Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciecnes, Moscow, Russia

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Ananiev, V.G., Bukharin, M.D. 2018: V.V. Struve i Institut istorii iskusstv (k istorii slozheniya kontsеptsii sotsial’noy revolyutsii na Drevnem Vostoke) [V.V. Struve and the Institute of History of Arts (towards the history of conception of social revolution in ancient Egypt)]. Vestnik Drevney Istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 4 (78), 971–989.

Ananiev, V.G., Bukharin, M.D. 2020: “Idealizirovat’ despotizm faraonov nikak ne prihoditsya”. V.V. Struve i formirovanie sovetskogo marksistskogo istoriopisaniya [There is no Need to Idealize the Despotism of Pharaos. V.V. Struve and Formation of Marxist Historiography]. 1931‒1932. Istoricheskiy arkhiv [Historical Archive] 5, 31‒48.

Bolshakov, A.O. 2011: Leningradskij egiptologicheskij kruzhok: U istokov sovetskoj egiptologii [Leningrad Egyptological Circle: At the Origins of Soviet Egyptology]. Kul’turnoantropologicheskie issledovaniya [Cultural and Anthropological Studies] 2, 5‒10.

Bolshakov, A.O. 2014: Leningradskiy Egiptologicheskiy Kruzhok: polgoda predystorii [Leningrad Egiptologichesky Circle: Half a Year of pre-History]. Aegyptiaca Rossica 2, 48‒120.

Bolshakov, A.O. 2015: Egipetskie ekspozitsii v Ermitazhe [Egyptian Expositions at the Hermitage]. Soobshcheniya Gosudarstvennogo Ermitazha [Communications of the State Hermitage] LXXIII, 160‒185.

Bukharin, M.D. 2019: Vasiliy Struve i slozhenie kategorial’nogo apparata sovetskoy istoricheskoy nauki [Vasily Struve and Formation of Categories of Soviet Historical Science]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Istoriya [Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. History] 4, 1440–1458.

Bukharin, M.D., Krikh, S.B. 2020: Istorik Vostoka v epohu peremen: raboty V.V. Struve i soveshchanie v OON AN SSSR v iyule 1936 g. [Historian of the Orient in an Era of Change: Works of V.V. Struve and the Session of the Department of Social Sciences of the Academy of Sciences of USSR in July 1936]. Vostok-Oriens 6, 196–206.

Diskussiya, 2009: Diskussiya ob aziatskom sposobe proizvodstva. Po dokladu M.S. Godesa [Discussion on the Asian Mode of production. According to the Report of M.S. Goodes]. 2nd Ed. Moscow.

Kachalina, G.I., Marishkina, V.F., Yakovleva, E.M. (eds.) 2004: Sotrudniki Imperatorskogo Ermitazha 1852–1917. Biobibliografi cheskij spravochnik [Employees of the Imperial Hermitage 1852‒1917. Bibliographic Handbook]. Saint Petersburg.

Kazin, V.N., Krechetova, M.N. 1939: Kul’tura i iskusstvo feodal’nogo Kitaya. Putevoditel’ po vystavke [The Culture and Art of Feudal China. Guidebook to the Exhibition]. Leningrad.

Krikh, S.B. 2018: Istoriya porazheniya: N.M. Nikol’skiy v bor’be za ponimanie obshchestvennogo stroya drevnevostochnyh obshchestv [History of Defeat: N.M. Nikolsky in the Struggle for Understanding the Social System of Ancient Eastern Societies]. Vostok (Oriens) 1, 13‒22.

Krikh, S.B. 2020: Drugaya istoriya: “Periferijnaya” sovetskaya nauka o drevnosti [Another History: “Peripheral” Soviet Science on Antiquity]. Moscow.

Kuzina, G.A. 1991: Gosudarstvennaya politika v oblasti muzeynogo dela v 1917–1941 gg. Muzey i vlast’. T. 1. Gosudarstvennaya politika v oblasti muzejnogo dela (XVIII–XX vv.) [State Policy in the fi eld of Museum Work in 1917‒1941. Museum and Power. Vol. 1. State Policy in the fi eld of Museum Work (18th ‒20th centuries)]. Moscow, 96‒172.

Ladynin, I.A. 2019a: Kontseptsiya feodalizma na drevnem Vostoke i raboty V.V. Struve 1910- kh – nachala 1930-kh gg. [The Concept of Feudalism in the Ancient Orient and the Work of V.V. Struve in the 1910s ‒ early 1930s.] Dialog so vremenem. Al’manah intellektual’noj istorii [Dialogue with time. Almanac of Intellectual History] 69, 251‒267.

Ladynin, I.A. 2019b: Ponyatie “Drevniy Vostok” v otechestvennoy istoriografi i XX v. [The concept of “Ancient Orient” in Russian Historiography of the 20th century] Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 3 (79), 772‒796.

Legran, B.V. 1934: Socialisticheskaya rekonstrukciya Ermitazha [Socialist Reconstruction of the Hermitage]. Leningrad.

Luppol, I.K. 1931: Trudy pervogo vserossiyskogo muzeynogo s’ezda. T. I. Protokoly plenarnykh zasedaniy 1–5 dekabrya 1930 g. [Proceedings of the First All-Russian Museum Congress. Vol. I. Minutes of Plenary Meetings on December 1‒5, 1930] Moscow.

Lurie, I.M. 1938: Stoimost’ raba v drevnem Egipte [Cost of a Slave in Ancient Egypt]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 4 (5), 65‒71.

Piotrovskiy B.B. 1995: Stranitsy moey zhizni [Pages of my Life]. Saint Petersburg. Solomakha, E.Yu. (ed.) 2016: Gosudarstvennyy Ermitazh. Muzeynye rasprodazhi. 1930–1931. Arhivnye dokumenty [State Hermitage. Museum sales. 1930–1931. Archival Documents]. Saint Petersburg.

Turaev, B.A. 1934: Istoriya Drevnego Vostoka [History of Ancient Orient]. In: V.V. Struve, I.L. Snegirev (eds.) Vol. I. Leningrad.

Zaks, A.B. 1980: Vserossiyskiy muzeynyy s’ezd [All-Russian Museum Congress]. Voprosy istorii [Questions of History] 12, 164–167.