download PDF

Abstract

The article deals with Seneca’s thoughts about the influence of public opinion on consciousness and behavior. Seneca used various terms for designation of public opinion. According to Seneca, public opinion obtrudes a false system of values upon a person. It infl uences consciousness and behavior by approving or condemning. The desire to earn the approval of public opinion and the fear of experiencing its condemnation cause dissembling, hypocrisy, anxiety, purchase of unnecessary things, injustice. Seneca thinks that the injustice are dangerous, because they provoke anger that is a harmful desire for revenge. The unthinking imitation of a behavior model that, according to public opinion, is correct, promotes depravity in the society. This Roman stoic opposes the common misconceptions with an aspiration for virtues as the purpose of life. He thinks that a man must ignore public opinion, follow reason and truth instead, live in accordance with nature, have a clear conscience, constantly fi ght his vices and rejoice in the virtues. Solitude and sciences help direct the spirit not to material welfare, but to the moral life. Seneca opposes the public opinion with the opinion of the men of virtue. In his view, their praise inspires a person to continue self-improvement. Their behavior is an example for imitation. Seneca not only attracted attention to the spread of conformism in the Roman society of the 1st century AD, but he attempted to comprehend its sources and offer the ways to counteract it from the standpoint of Stoicism.

Keywords

Ancient Rome, Stoicism, Seneca, public opinion.

Svetlana S. Demina

Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs, Vladimir, Russia

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Bettini, M. 2008: Weighty Words, Suspect Speech: Fari in Roman Culture. Arethusa 41.2, 313–375.

Bond, S. 2014: Altering Infamy: Status, Violence, and Civic Exclusion in Late Antiquity. Classical Antiquity 33.1, 1–30.

Demina, S.S. 2020: Predstavleniya TSitserona i Seneki o politike i emotsiyakh [Cicero’s and Seneca’s thoughts about politics and emotions], Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya Istoriya [Perm University Herald. History] 2, 17–23.

Демина, С.С. 2020: Представления Цицерона и Сенеки о политике и эмоциях. Вестник Пермского университета. Сер. История 2, 17–23.

Descheemaeker, E. 2009: Protecting Reputation: Defamation and Negligence. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29.4, 603–641.

Gibson, B.J. 1998: Rumours as causes of events in Tacitus. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 40, 111–129.

Guastella, G. 2017: Word of Mouth: Fama and Its Personifi cations in Art and Literature from Ancient Rome to the Middle Ages. Oxford.

Habinek, Th. 2000: Seneca’s Renown: Gloria, Claritudo, and the Replication of the Roman Elite. Classical Antiquity 19.2, 264–303.

Hallett, J.P. 2006: Sulpicia and Her Fama: An Intertextual Approach to Recovering Her Latin Literary Image. Classical World 100.1, 37–42.

Hardie, Ph. 2012: Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge and New York.

Karamalengou, E. 2016: Poeta, Heros et Fama: Perplexities and Upsets in Cicero’s Epic Fragments. In: Kyriakidis, Stratis (ed.), Libera Fama: An Endless Journey. Cambridge, 45–54.

Karpyuk, S.G. 1997: Vulgus i turba: tolpa v klassicheskom Rime [Vulgus and turba: Mob in Classical Rome]. Vestnik Drevney Istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 4, 121–137.

Карпюк, С.Г. 1997: Vulgus и turba: толпа в классическом Риме. ВДИ 4, 121–137.

Knabe, G.S. 1988: Kategoriya prestizhnosti v zhizni Drevnego Rima [The category of prestigiousness in the life of Ancient Rome]. In: Knabe, G.S. (ed.), Byt i istoria v antichnosti [Life and History in Antiquity]. Moscow, 143–169.

Кнабе, Г.С. 1988: Категория престижности в жизни Древнего Рима. В кн.: Г.С. Кнабе (ред.), Быт и история в античности. Москва, 143–169.

Laurence, R. 1994: Rumour and Communication in Roman Politics. Greece & Rome 41.1, 62–74.

Mezheritskij, Ya.Yu. 1988: Iners otium. In: Knabe, G.S. (ed.), Byt i istoria v antichnosti [Life and History in Antiquity]. Moscow, 41–68.

Межерицкий, Я.Ю. 1988: Iners otium. В кн.: Г.С. Кнабе (ред.), Быт и история в античности. Москва, 41–68.

Néraudau, J.-P. 1993: La fama dans la Rome antique. Médiévales 24, 27–34.

Portnjagina, I.P. 2014: Lutsiy Anney Seneca o sisteme vospitaniya i samovospitaniya (teoriya i praktika) [Lucius Annaeus Seneca on the problem of education and self-education (theory and practice)]. Mnemon: Issledovaniya i publikatsii po istorii antichnogo mira [Mnemon: Investigations and Publications on the History of Ancient World] 14, 211–222.

Портнягина, И.П. 2014: Луций Анней Сенека о системе воспитания и самовоспитания (теория и практика). Мнемон: Исследования и публикации по истории античного мира 14, 211–222.

Rosillo-López, C. 2017: Public Opinion and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.

Shatzman, I. 1974: Tacitean Rumours. Latomus 33.3, 549–578.

Yavetz, Z. 1974: Existimatio, Fama, and the Ides of March. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 78, 35–65.