download PDF

Abstract

The article addresses one of the important aspects of the problem of studying the infl uence of military-political factors on Greco-Barbarian trade: their infl uence on the characteristics and intensity of trade routes. A comparative analysis was carried out on the materials of the regions belonging respectively to the near and far barbarian periphery of the Classical World – the Kuban region and the interfl uve of the Volga and the Ural. The mechanisms for the infl uence of military-political factors on trade routes leading to the tribes of the Kuban region and the interfl uve of the Volga and the Ural and passing through their territories in the Sarmatian period are examined trough case histories. With differences in the set of specifi c politico-military factors in the Kuban region and the interfl uve of the Volga and the Ural, there is a great deal of similarity in the general mechanisms of infl uence of different types of factors on the characteristics and intensity of trade routes, to and through these regions. The main types of these factors include military operations, piracy, general changes in the military-political situation and migrations. The similarity in the mechanisms is due to the commonality of the main routes for the movement of сommodities to the near and far barbaric periphery for the fi rst phase (trade between ancient states) and the common elements in the structure of trade routes, including emporia as main trading hubs. Major differences, however, in the impact of military-political factors on the trade routes in the near and far peripheries were the creation of a more secure trading environment in the Emporia territory of the near periphery and the need to control caravan routes and escort caravans in the territory of far periphery.

Keywords

Trade routes, military-political factors, Greco-Barbarian trade, Kuban region, interfl uve of the Volga and the Ural, Sarmatians, Maeotians, Bosporan kingdom.

Andrey V. Bezrukov

Nosov Magnitogotsk State Technical Univercity, Magnitogorsk, Russia

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Vladislav V. Ulitin

Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abramzon, M.G. Dva peripla iz Fanagorii v Vostochoe Sredizemnomor’e (po dannym pozdneellinisticheskikh kladov) [Two peripli from the Phanagoria to the Eastern Mediterranean (according to Late Hellenistic hoards)]. In: V.D. Kuznetsov, A.A. Zavoykin (eds.), Rezul’taty arkheologicheskikh issledovaniy 4 [Results of archaeological research 4] (Phanagoria 7). Moscow, 6–30.

Bezrukov, A.V., Ulitin, V.V. 2020: Torgovye svyazi plemeyn Prikuban’ya I mezhdurech’ya Volgi i Urala s antichnymi tsentrami v kontekste voenno-politicheskoy istorii vo II v. do n.e. – II v. n.e. [Trade contacts between the tribes of Kuban Region and the Interfl uve of the Volga and the Ural and the ancient centers in the context of military-political history in the 2nd century BC to 2nd century AD]. Stratum plus 3, 119–136.

Brashinskiy, I.B. 1973: Pontiyskoe piratstvo [Pontic Piracy]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 3, 124–133.

Brashinskiy, I.B. 1984: Metody issledovaniya antichnoy torgovli [Research Methods of Ancient Trade]. Leningrad.

Gaydukevich, V.F. 1949: Bosporskoye tsarstvo [Bosporan Kingdom]. Moscow–Leningrad.

Koshelenko, G.A., Malyshev, A.A., Ulitin, V.V. 2010: Torgovlya [Trade]. In: G.M. Bongard-

Levin, V.D. Kuznetsov (eds.), Antichnoe nasledie Kubani [Ancient Heritage of Kuban] 2. Moscow, 256–289.

Limberis, N. Yu., Marchenko, I. I. 2017: Pogrebeniya s fi bulami iz gruntovogo mogil’nika meotskogo gorodishcha Spornoe [Graves with Fibulae from the Burial Ground of the Maeotian Settlement Spornoye]. Stratum plus 4, 201–214.

Molev, E.A. 1995: Vlastitel’ Ponta [The sovereign of Pontos]. Nizhny Novgorod.

Polanyi, K. 2010: Izbrannye raboty [Selected papers]. Moscow.

Saprykin, S.Yu. Pontiyskiye proksenii i marshruty plavaniy grekov po Chernomu moryu [Pontic proxenies and sea-routes of ancient Greeks in the Euxin]. In: V.V. Klychnikov (ed.), Prichernomor’e v antichnoe i rannesrednevekovoe vremya [Black Sea region in antiquity and early Middle-Ages. Papers presented to V.P. Kopylov on the occasion of his 65th Birthday]. Rostov-on-Don, 119–126.

Skripkin, A.S. 2010: Sarmaty i Vostok. Sbornik izbrannykh trudov A.S. Skripkina [Sarmatians and the East. A.S. Skripkin’s Selected Works]. Volgograd.

Skripkin, A.S. 2017: O nekotorykh osobennostyakh nachala funktsionirovaniya severnogo otvetvleniya Velikogo Sheylkovogo puti [Some features of the functioning of the northern branch of the Great Silk Road]. Vestnik VolGU. Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Science Journal of VolSU. History. Area Studies. International Relations] 22.2, 6–14.

Shelov, D.B. 1965: Italiyskie I zapadnorimskie izdeliya v torgovle Tanaisa pervykh vekov n.e. [Italian and Western Roman products in the trade of Tanais of early centuries AD]. Acta archaeologica Hungarica 17, 251–274.

Shelov, D.B. 1970: Tanais i Nizhniy Don v III—I vv. do n. e. [Tanais and Lower Don in 3rd–1st centuries BC]. Moscow.

Shelov, D.B. 1972: Tanais i Nizhniy Don v pervye veka nashey ery [Tanais and Lower Don in the first centuries AD]. Moscow.

Shelov, D.B. 1983: Goroda Severnogo Prichernomor’ya i Mitridat Evpator [The North Black Sities and Mithridates Eupator]. Vestnik Drevney Istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 2, 40–58.

Shilov, V.P. 1974: K probleme vzaimootnosheniy kochevykh plemyen i antichnykh gorodov Severnogo Prichernomor’ya v sarmatskuyu epokhu [Towards the problem of the relationship between nomadic tribes and the ancient cities of the North Black Sea region in the Sarmatian period]. Kratkie soobshcheniya Instituta arkheologii [Brief Communications of the Institute of Archaeology] 138, 6–65.

Ulitin, V.V. 2020: Epitafi ya na nadgrobii kuptsa Khrestiona iz Pantikapeya (KBN 142): problema interpretatsii [The epitaph on the tombstone of the merchant Chrestion from Panticapaeum (CIRB 142): interpretations problems]. In: A.G. Ivanov (ed.), Problemy issledovaniya zarubezhnoy istorii [Problems and foreign history studies: collection of scientifi c works]. Krasnodar, 12–20.

Vinogradov, Yu. A., Goroncharovskii, V. A. 2009: Voennaya istoriia i voennoe delo Bospora Kimmeriyskogo (VI v. do n. e. — seredina III v. n. e.) [Military History and Warfare of Cimmerian Bosporus (6th Century BC – Midd-3rd Century AD)]. Saint Petersburg.

Vinogradov, Yu. G. 1994: Ocherk voenno-politicheskoy istorii sarmatov v I v. n.e. [Military and political history of Sarmatians in the fi rst century AD]. Vestnik Drevney Istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 2, 151–170.

Vnukov, S. Yu. 2006: Prichernomorskie amfory I v. do n. e. – II v. n. e. Chast’ II: Petrografi ya, khronologiya, problemy torgovli [Pontic Amphorae of the 1st Century BC. to the 2nd Century AD. Pt 2: Petrography, chronology, trade problems]. Saint Petersburg.

Zhebelev, S.A. 1953: Severnoe Prichernomor’e. Issledovaniya i stat’i po istorii Severnogo Prichernomor’ya antichnoy epokhi [North Black Sea region. Studies and articles on the history of the North Black Sea region]. Moscow–Leningrad.