download PDF

Abstract

The sites with the petroglyphs of the Russian Far East (Sikachi-Alyan, Sheremetyevo, Kiya), documented by expeditions of Alexey P. Okladnikov in the 20th century keep the potential of new discoveries. Okladnikov fi rst visited Sikachi-Alyan and nearby sites in 1935 as part of an expedition of the Institute of Anthropology, Archeology and Ethnography of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Since 1958, works on documenting the rock art of the Lower Amur have been carried out under his leadership. Since the beginning of the 2000s, the movement of boulders due to impact of river ice during breaking as well as losses associated with both natural and anthropogenic impact on sites with petroglyphs has been continuously monitored. One of the main tasks of research is the search for images that are not observed after the expeditions of Okladnikov, as well as previously unknown petroglyphs, for which various archival materials of past years are utilized. In 2004, in the Department of Archeology of the MAE RAS, Elena A. Miklashevich discovered a folder with so-called estampages (paper squeezes) of Amur petroglyphs, made in 1935. As one of the techniques for documenting rock art monuments, it was used for copying and displaying petroglyphs of Central Asia, Karelia and other regions of Russia. This study is about the experience of creating three-dimensional polygonal models of estampages and comparing them with models of modern surfaces with petroglyphs. The objective of the comparison was to assess the accuracy of the reproduction of the rock art by the method of paper squeezing, as well as the possibility of using 3D models of the estampages for change and damage detection.

Keywords

Petroglyphs, Sikachi-Alyan, Russian Far East, A.P. Okladnikov, estampages.

Yuriy M. Svoyskiy, RSSDA Laboratory, Institute for Oriental and Classical Studies, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Elena S. Levanova, Institute of Archaeology RAS, Moscow, Russia, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Ekaterina V. Romanenko, RSSDA Laboratory, Moscow, Russia, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Ekaterina S. Konakova, RSSDA Laboratory, Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (the Kunstkamera), Moscow, St. Petersburg, Russia, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Bravina, S.V., Tuchkov, I.I. 1963: Geologicheskaya karta SSSR. Seriya Nizhne-Amurskaya [Geological map of the USSR. The Lower Amur series]. Sheet N-54-XXXIII. Leningrad.

Devlet, E.G., Devlet, M.A. 2005: Mify v kamne. Mir naskal’nogo iskusstva Rossii [Myths in stone. The world of rock art of Russia]. Moscow.

Devlet, E.G., Laskin, A.R., Svoyskiy, Yu.M., Romanenko, E.V. 2017: Dokumentirovanie landshaftnogo konteksta i izobrazitel’nykh osobennostey dal’nevostochnykh pamyatnikov naskal’nogo iskusstva [Documenting the landscape context and visual features of the Far Eastern monuments of rock art]. In: A.P. Derevyanko, A.A. Tishkin (eds.), Trudy V (XXI) Vserossiyskogo arkheologicheskogo s”ezda v Barnaule–Belokurikhe [Proceedings of the V (XXI) All-Russian Archaeological Congress in Barnaul-Belokurikha], Vol. III. Barnaul. P. 93–100.

Kharitonichev, E.I., Scheerov, E.P. 1978: Geologicheskaya karta SSSR. Seriya Khingano- Bureinskaya [Geological map of the USSR. Khingano-Bureinskaya series]. Sheet M-53- XXVIII. Leningrad.

Kharlamov, N.G. 1933: Ruiny “Gal’bu” [The ruins of “Galbu”]. Problemy istorii material’noi kul’tury [Problems of the history of material culture] 1-2, 42–44.

Laskin, A.R., Devlet, E.G., Grin’ko, A.E., Svoyskiy, Yu.M., Romanenko, E.S. 2018: Novye rezul’taty dokumentirovaniya petroglifov i modelirovaniya sakral’nykh landshaftov pamyatnikov naskal’nogo iskusstva Dal’nego Vostoka [New results of documentation of petroglyphs and modelling of sacral landscapes of monuments of the Far East]. Problemy istorii, fi lologii, kul’tury [Journal of historical, philological and cultural studies] 2 (60), 244–255.

Laufer, B. 1899: Petroglyphs on the Amoor. American anthropologist. New series I, 746–750.

Miklashevich, E.A. 2015: Estampazhi amurskikh petroglifov iz ekspeditsii A.P. Okladnikova 1935 goda [Estampages of the Amur petroglyphs from A.P. Okladnikov’s expedition in 1935]. Problemy istorii, fi lologii, kul’tury [Journal of historical, philological and cultural studies] 4 (50), 5–25.

Okladnikov, A. 1981: Ancient art of the Amur region. Leningrad.

Okladnikov, A.P. 1968: Liki drevnego Amura [Faces of the ancient Amur]. Novosibirsk.

Okladnikov, A.P. 1971: Petroglify Nizhnego Amura [Petroglyphs of the Lower Amur]. Leningrad.

Rusakova, I.D., Mukhareva, A.N. 2017: Materialy A.P. Okladnikova po petroglifam Nizhnego Amura v fondakh muzeya-zapovednika “Tomskaya Pisanitsa” [The materials of A.P. Okladnikov on the petroglyphs of the Lower Amur in the funds of the museumpreserve “Tomskaya Pisanitsa”]. Izobrazitel’nye i tekhnologicheskiye traditsii v rannikh formakh iskusstva [Iconographic and technological traditions in early forms of art] (1). Moscow; Kemerovo, 49–64.

Svoyskiy, Yu.M., Romanenko, E.V., Miklashevich, E.A. 2018: Opyt sozdaniya tsifrovykh obrazov estampazhey eniseyskikh petroglifov metodom trekhmernogo modelirovaniya [The experience of creating digital images of the estampages of the Yenisei petroglyphs by the method of 3D modeling]. Camera praehistorica 1, 106–116.